Blog

  • Texas oil regulator cuts out the public

    Sep 17, 2026
    Published in San Antonio Express News

    Texas Railroad Commissioner Wayne Christian led the agency's effort to cut out public comment at meetings. Texans will now be heard only “at the discretion of the commissioners,” he said.

JAY JANNER/AMERICAN-STATESMAN
    Texas Railroad Commissioner Wayne Christian led the agency’s effort to cut out public comment at meetings. Texans will now be heard only “at the discretion of the commissioners,” he said. JAY JANNER/AMERICAN-STATESMAN

    As bad actors in the oil and gas business offload more of their waste onto the communities the industry most depends on, the state’s lead oil regulator just took a major step to ban Texans from speaking their minds.

    Last month the Railroad Commission of Texas — which oversees oil and gas, not railroads — ended guaranteed public comment at its monthly open meetings. Texans will now be heard only “at the discretion of the commissioners,” as Commissioner Wayne Christian put it. The commission did not take comment on that item, either. When one of us, Virginia, rose to point out that the commission had just “approved an agenda item on public participation without allowing public participation,” she was cut off.

    Oil- and gas-producing communities have always borne a heavy burden from an industry that has brought Texas so much wealth — riches that often come at the cost of tainted water, poisoned air and blighted soil. These costs are rising. The average new Permian well now runs more than two miles sideways underground — and every added foot means more drill waste laced with arsenic and radium.

    Each barrel of oil comes up with more toxic brine than the one before — three and a half barrels on average. Railroad Commissioner Jim Wright told the Senate in August that pushing more wastewater underground is like “trying to stuff 20 ounces of fluid in a 12 ounce can,” and that the pressure could set off “some major seismic event tomorrow.” The industry’s answer: put it aboveground, on cropland and into rivers. When the state’s environmental regulator asked Texans about that this year, virtually all of the comments objected.

    This is the kind of public input that the Railroad Commission has made a habit of avoiding. Take flaring — the industry’s unpopular burning off of excess gas — which sickens communities downwind. The commission boasts that flaring is down — based on numbers the industry reports about itself. When the Legislature noticed in 2021 that Railroad Commission numbers didn’t match the state environmental regulator’s numbers, it ordered the commission to evaluate solutions. The commission wrote the plan, at public expense, and promised to share the findings.

    But when a Texas scientist asked to see it this June, the commission went to the attorney general for permission to keep the plan a secret — and two days after the vote to end public comment, they got it. Commission Shift has published reports documenting the Railroad Commission’s failure to enforce limits on its flaring permits. Community members in South Texas have reported serious respiratory problems after flares were operated near their homes or workplaces.

    Or look at wastewater. The agency will automatically approve a new injection well — which can threaten underground drinking water — inside a permitted area if its own staff don’t object within 20 days. Every such new injection well adds pressure — think of Wright’s 12-ounce can metaphor — and that pressure can push old, plugged wells back to life. One of us, Saul, recently mapped some 25,000 plugged Texas wells at critical risk of erupting with brine and gas, roughly 50 times the number previously reported. But the public has only 15 days to protest before this blanket area permit is approved, and a community’s first warning is often the rumble of 18-wheelers. And when a company violates its permit, potentially threatening groundwater, the Railroad Commission lets them settle in private. Neighbors learn of it, if ever, only after the commissioners sign off.

    And then there is solid waste. When the Railroad Commission rewrote its drilling-waste rules for the first time in 40 years, it required drillers to register reserve pits — but not to notify the landowner, over the protests of oil field residents who came to Austin — a rule written after two years of closed-door meetings with industry and not one hearing in the oil field.

    We may know why Christian proposed to shut the public out: when Texans see what the modern oil and gas business has become, they get angry. Ask the people of Paxton, in East Texas, who watched six of the commission’s own examiners, conclude that a proposed oil field waste dump would sit atop groundwater four feet down, 1,200 feet from the water supply that serves some 650 families, and recommend denial — only to have  Christian and Wright approve it, over Craddick’s dissent. This is the same 2-1 split that just ended public comment. 

    None of this is hard to fix. Commissioners could put public comment back on every agenda tomorrow. They could start taking testimony by phone, the way the state’s environmental regulator does. They could allow comments on agenda items, not only at the end of the meeting. They could release the flaring plan. The Legislature should demand all of the above.

    But there’s one thing that commissioners themselves need to grapple with. If Texans at meetings are angry, it’s not because they hate or misunderstand the oil business. It’s often they have been railroaded — systematically shut out of a process with life-and-death consequences for their land, water and the health of their families. Texans don’t sit down and shut up when these things are threatened. If we can be accused of one abuse, let it be freedom of speech.

    Virginia Palacios has attended the Railroad Commission’s monthly open meetings for the past five years as executive director of Commission Shift, a nonprofit watchdog. Saul Elbein, a longtime energy journalist, runs Future Heist, a watchdog organization dedicated to broadcasting news about threats to the soil, air and water of Texas. 

  • How to fight Texas wastewater permits

    All five Permian discharge applications—for the Pecos River basin—are currently under TCEQ review and comments are open now. You can submit comments or request a public meeting through TCEQ’s eComment site.

    • NGL Water Solutions Permian (Reeves County) — #WQ0005445000 — Proposed permit details —
    • Solaris Water Midstream (Reeves County) — #WQ0005471000 — Proposed permit details —
    • Solaris Water Midstream No. 2 (Culberson County) — #WQ0005474000 — Proposed permit details —
    • Texas Pacific Water Resources (Reeves County) — #WQ0005454000 — Proposed permit details —
    • Select Water Solutions (Reeves County) — #WQ0005495000 — Proposed permit details —

    Readers living in Texas can also subscribe to TCEQ’s permit notices, which allow Texas residents to get notice of projects planned for their zip code—or monitor its long list of pending wastewater permits.

    Anyone can comment, but those who are directly impacted by these discharges—downstream landowners, irrigators, water users, and people who rely on the Pecos—can go further. If enough write in, they can push the agency into a contested hearing—a trial-like proceeding where they can challenge the permit’s facts. And if they’ve commented, they can establish the standing to challenge a project in court.

    At some point in the coming months, the agency will start issuing draft permits, which will start a 30 day counter, after which comment will close.

    For those who are impacted, environmental advocates say, the key things to do are are:

    1. Taking good records of how you use the affected waterway for business, recreation or irrigation
    2. Commenting within 30 days of the issuance of a draft permit to establish standing, and
    3. Getting organized before the permits drop, because once they do, things move fast.

    Veterans of this process emphasize that the odds of successfully getting a permit denied or revoked are low. But contested hearings, court battles and local comments form a broader drama of local democracy that can sway elected officials, persuade companies to seek greener pastures, and become grist for electoral or legislative efforts at reform—as the grassroots campaigns against data centers have shown.

    If you or someone you know relies on water near the proposed discharge sites, owns or works affected land, irrigates downstream, or has information that could help document the risks, contact Future Heist. We can help connect people with public-interest environmental lawyers following these cases.

  • TCEQ Air Quality Event Data

    Every year, Texas chemical plants, refineries, and industrial facilities report thousands of air quality events to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. These aren’t routine emissions—they’re excess releases, equipment failures, and spills that the companies are legally required to disclose.

    What’s in here

    • 100,000+ incidents
    • ~2,000 chemicals
    • Full incident details

    This dataset brings that scattered reporting into one place: 100,000+ incidents, with details on what was released, where, how much, and what the company said about what happened.

    Download the data

    Complete incident database

    All incidents with full details: date, facility, chemicals, duration, and company responses, incidents.csv.zip

    All incidents by chemical, incident_contaminants.csv.zip 

    Chemical breakdown

    Top 50 compounds by frequency — Which chemicals show up most? Where? How often? Rankings with year-by-year trends and by unit type.

    About the data

    Source: TCEQ’s public Exception Event Reporting system. This is the official channel through which facilities legally must report excess emissions, spills, and accidents.

    What it captures: Planned maintenance, equipment failures, weather events, accidents, and other incidents that trigger reporting requirements. This is not routine day-to-day emissions—it’s the stuff companies have to announce because something went wrong or exceeded limits.

    What it doesn’t capture: Routine emissions within permitted levels, permitted flaring, or incidents companies may have failed to report. TCEQ enforcement actions are separate.

    Data quality: Company descriptions are entered by facility staff. They range from precise (times, volumes, cause) to vague (“operational issue”). This dataset preserves what was reported, not what a regulator independently confirmed.

    Data & Questions

    Full data, the tools to download it yourself, documentation, or questions: See the GitHub repository

  • 1.2 Million Oil Wells Are Buried Underneath Texas. Do You Live on Top of a Dangerous One?

    Published in The Texas Observer

    Dallas-Fort Worth-area suburban housing (Shutterstock)
    Dallas-Fort Worth-area suburban housing (Shutterstock)

    his spring, a Permian Basin pastor got an unpleasant surprise: a geyser of more than 1.5 million gallons of toxic brine gushing up through the parking lot of the First Baptist Church in Grandfalls. It was a “zombie well”—what happens when the plug on one of the state’s hundreds of thousands of old wells fails, releasing poisonous gas and water onto the property above.

    These blowouts are dangerous in themselves. The gas that comes up can be poisonous enough to kill, as it did an oilfield worker and his wife in Odessa in 2019. The water carries benzene and xylene, which cause cancer and wreck the hormonal and reproductive systems of humans and animals. When it comes from injected wastewater, it can also carry a secretive mix of synthetic chemicals, including the “forever chemicals” known as PFAS.

    But the spills are only the visible part of the problem. Every oil and gas well, once drilled, is a hazard someone has to keep sealed forever. And Texas has a lot of wells.

    Earlier this year, two articles—one of them my own in the Barbed Wire and another in the Texas Observer—uncovered the story of a subdivision and elementary school south of Fort Worth built on an old landfarm, a field where drilling waste from the fracking boom had been spread across the soil. Parents at the school alleged that their children had developed strange health complaints, though after our reporting, the developer released results from testing it had commissioned that found the ground was clean.

    I’ve been writing about the toll the oil and gas industry takes on its neighbors since the early days of the fracking boom, when I covered a North Texas family sickened by a shale gas well placed on their land without their consent and (for the Observer) another family on the Keystone XL route left for years with a lake of raw sewage in their front yard. That work taught me that, for many oil and gas operators, dumping their waste on their neighbors—trash that otherwise they would have to pay to prevent or clean up—is simply standard business practice. 

    Today, I run Future Heist, a watchdog group that focuses on threats to Texas land and water and the communities moving against them. The Fort Worth-area landfarm—which happened to be in a county with a history of grievous environmental contamination and a local government unusually committed to investigating it—looked to me like one visible trace of something much larger. During the Barnett Shale fracking boom of the 2000s and early 2010s, oil and gas exploration companies, working at a frenzied pace with minimal regulation or oversight, drilled some 21,000 wells around the Metroplex, each producing thousands of tons of solid waste. That waste had to go somewhere, and it was often spread on farmland surrounding drilling areas—the kind of areas now turning into suburbs. 

    Unfortunately, Texas keeps no public record of where that waste ended up. So my colleague, Greg Randall, and I looked at what the state does track: the wells themselves. And, in particular, which wells were at the greatest risk of going zombie.

    Over months, we built a map that turns the state’s scattered and impenetrable records into something a normal person can actually use: a way to look up what lies beneath your own address.

    (Future Heist, screenshot)

    The Railroad Commission has around 1.2 million wells on its books, some 300,000 of them plugged. From those records we built a profile of the ones most likely to fail. Many things can turn a plugged well into a zombie, and the first is the plug itself.

    The wells are sealed with cement, but cement does not stay sealed. Blake Scott, an oilfield-waste specialist who spent decades in the industry, told me the physics is not in doubt: Whether underground or on the surface, cement will eventually fail. “We’re betting that plug is going to last forever, when we know damn good and well it’s going to crack,” he told me. 

    Once a well is sealed, Scott added, the oil and gas industry, “likes to talk like it’s sealed forever. No, it’s not.” His challenge to anyone who assumes an underground plug lasts forever: Walk out to your nearest driveway and count the cracks.

    But even that assumes the plug was any good to begin with. The American Petroleum Institute issued its final plugging guidance only in 2019, so the wells failing now were sealed under much older rules. 

    Nor is the work always done by anyone with reason to do it well. Old wells pass down to mom-and-pop operators or to the cash-poor subsidiaries that big companies spin off so they can quietly declare bankruptcy. Hawk Dunlap, a well-control specialist who ran for the Railroad Commission this year, has put the problem simply: “No one likes to pay for a funeral.”

    Then, there is the pressure pushing up on those plugs from below. A fracked well produces about four times as much highly salty and chemical-laden “produced water” as it does oil, and that wastewater is typically pumped back underground. 

    The amounts of water pumped back underground are staggering. Katie Smye, a geoscientist at the University of Texas at Austin, has counted some 60 billion barrels injected into the Permian Basin, half of that since 2010—enough to fill Texas’ biggest lake, Toledo Bend, nearly twice over with toxic brine. So much wastewater has been pumped underground that in parts of West Texas, the ground has begun to bulge upward. All that pressurized fluid seeks a way out, and an old well is often the readiest one. In a 2024 study, researchers at SMU traced fluid that had moved roughly 12 miles underground before erupting from a plugged well—far outside the radius our own map treats as the danger zone around an injection site.

    One such well caused the disaster at the Grandfalls church. How many more are inching toward their own catastrophe? Impossible to say, short of thousands of professionals walking the field and checking every one.

    But our map shows which wells we calculate are at the highest risk. Our model weighs several factors, all drawn from state records. First is the age of the well and its plugs, both of which likely correlate to poor construction, plus the state’s own data on construction quality. A special bonus, so to speak, goes to injection wells with a documented history of violations or construction failures. But most significant is the number of injection wells pumping wastewater within a mile of the plugged well, into the same underground layers it connects to; the more of them there are, the higher the risk that the plug will fail and wastewater will spew above.

    Put together, this analysis flagged more than 25,000 plugged wells across the state at critical risk of failure—50 times more wells at risk of going zombie than had previously been reported, as the Houston Chronicle noted when it covered our findings last month. But a failing plug does not have to cause a dramatic blowout to be dangerous. It can seep for years, and because it is buried, no one above it ever knows. A peer-reviewed Pennsylvania study found that plugged wells released benzene, a carcinogen, at rates that could not be told apart from active ones. Plugged, it turns out, is not the same as sealed.

    This means health risks for anyone living above. Benzene is a known cause of leukemia; drilling waste carries naturally radioactive radium and arsenic as well. An underground leak reaches a home through the soil itself, as gas and vapor rise up through the foundation—and children, who pound for pound breathe roughly twice as much air as adults, take a double dose of whatever arrives.

    Texans are living on top of a hundred years of drilling by an industry that was never made to clean up after itself. With statewide officials in Austin who rank among the largest recipients of oil and gas money in the state’s history, that is not about to change. We built the Zombie Risk map so Texans can at least see what’s under them. Look up your address.

  • Oil execs exposed the industry’s greatest weakness

    Published in Heated

    A storage tank hold fracking wastewater, also known as produced water, in Stillwater, Oklahoma. Drillers in America’s largest oil-producing region are proposing to treat produced water and pour it onto crops and into waterways. (Photo by J Pat Carter/Getty Images)

    Sometime in the next few months, Texas is set to issue its first permits letting the oil industry pour treated fracking wastewater into rivers and onto cropland.

    Five applications are currently pending, covering more than 18 million gallons of wastewater per day, all bound for the Pecos and the Atascosa Rivers. The company furthest along expects approval by the end of the year. The Texas environmental regulator is also actively working on the rules that would allow oilfield waste to be sprayed on cropland.

    It may sound crazy to dump treated fracking waste on land that is used to grow food, or into waterways connected to drinking water supplies. But last month, oil and gas industry representatives gathered before the state Senate to explain why they desperately need to do exactly this.

    In doing so, they inadvertently gave the public a free lesson in how to bring the U.S. oil and gas industry to its knees.

    Wastewater: The oil industry’s achilles heel

    What happens in the Permian Basin over the next few years will help determine how hot the planet gets. The Permian, which sits under West Texas and southeastern New Mexico and produces about half of all American oil, is a vast flat landscape of endless pumpjacks and burning flares that has been unfavorably compared to Mordor. It is currently on track to become the single biggest source of climate pollution on Earth.

    A panorama showing oil wells that cover the landscape in the Permian Basin. Photo by: Jim West/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

    But producers in the Permian are running into a serious problem: They are running out of space to dispose of their toxic, often radioactive wastewater, often called “produced water,” which comes out of the ground at about four times the rate of every barrel of oil.

    The Permian brings up nearly a billion gallons of this wastewater every day. In addition to being as much as 10 times saltier than the ocean, this wastewater often contains organic carcinogens like benzene; naturally-occurring poisons like arsenic and cadmium; radioactive isotopes like radium; as well as new human-made poisons like PFAS, or forever chemicals.

    To dispose of it, producers have historically injected it back underground—a process that has caused a set of problems like earthquakes serious enough to crack home foundations, and toxic water bubbling out of the Earth.

    A geyser of toxic fracking wastewater erupts from the ground in 2024 in Toyah, Texas. (Elizabeth Conley/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images)

    But the space to inject produced water underground is running out. “We’re basically trying to stuff 20 ounces of fluid in a 12-ounce can,” as Jim Wright, chairman of the Texas Railroad Commission, told Texas lawmakers in a hearing last month. “Pretty soon, that’s not going to work very well.” (The Railroad Commission is, despite its name and the many calls to change it, the state oil and gas regulator.)

    To solve this problem, the industry representatives are proposing a new, big business of treating fracking wastewater to make it less toxic, then pouring it directly onto cropland and into waterways. Michael Lozano, who represents Permian Basin producers, pointed to projections that oil and gas producers could invest $156 billion into such “reuse” by 2030, including a new network of pipelines and treatment facilities.

    Industry representatives are promoting produced water as a safe new resource, portraying the science as settled. “We know this can be done safely, effectively, and robustly to ensure that we’re creating and taking full advantage of this new water source that has not existed for our human species for 10,000 years,” Lozano said. They’ve pointed to an August study that used treated produced water to grow alfalfa, a common cattle feed, as proof.

    But that study’s own authors have urged caution. They wrote that long-term research is needed to assess the practice’s cumulative effects on soil, plants, and microbial communities. Civic and environmental organizations also argue there is scant evidence that industry can treat produced water at anything close to the cost or scale it promises. Their concern is not simply whether water can be cleaned in a laboratory or a pilot project, but whether Texas’s standards will require treatment rigorous enough for widespread reuse. Under proposed state rules, treated produced water would be regulated no more stringently than municipal sewage.

    Critics have a concrete reason to fear that outcome: Texas has already moved to make sure the industry won’t have to pay for damage if the experiment goes wrong. Last year, the Texas Legislature passed H.B. 49, a law giving any company that buys, uses, treats or discharges produced water a near-total shield from legal liability if the waste harms people, livestock or property.

    It’s no surprise, then, that this proposal is very unpopular across political lines. For example, in my own reporting on a Texas elementary school built on a dumping ground for untreated waste from gas drilling—a case I later discussed with HEATED—I heard rock-solid Republicans voicing concern that Gov. Abbott planned to “put fracking fluid on our food.” A Future Heist analysis of comments on the proposed rule found virtually unanimous opposition.

    Still, oil industry representatives are trying to push the proposal through—because if they don’t, they warn, they won’t be able to keep drilling.

    “If the water cannot move, the oil cannot flow,” produced water lobbyist Trace Finley warned at the hearing.

    Republican state Senator Tan Parker was even more blunt. If they didn’t approve permits to dump treated fracking wastewater onto crops and into rivers, he said, “we’re going to find ourselves in two or three years with a gun to our head.”

    Without meaning to, Parker had just told his opponents exactly where to apply pressure.

    They key to stopping Permian drilling: Mobilize against wastewater permits

    At the August hearing, oil and gas industry representatives warned Texas leaders that their plan for American energy dominance had a critical bottleneck: permits.

    The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), the state’s environmental regulator, is responsible for granting permits governing how produced water is treated, put on crop fields, and dumped in rivers. That agency began reviewing applications “nearly three years ago,” oil regulator Wright complained. But “to date, no final permit has been issued.”

    The reason for the delay, according to the TCEQ, is that it’s taking its time to do the science properly. But the oil industry is pressuring them to move quickly—and they have support from powerful friends.

    For the Trump administration, Sen. Parker told the committee, there is “no higher priority than produced water.” The Trump EPA is weakening water protection rules with the explicit goal of “unleashing” oil and gas, floating the idea of using treated fracking waste for everything from rangeland irrigation to cooling AI data centers.

    That is to say: Stopping this machine will not be easy. Both the Trump Administration and Texas’s Republican leadership is all-in on a policy almost nobody who has weighed in wants. As Parker put it: “You’re never going to have an environment where you have a legislative process, a governor, lieutenant governor, more supportive of this.”

    The opposition movement will also have to seriously reckon with jobs. Roughly a quarter million people work in the Permian, where oil and gas remains the economic engine. Its jobs are dangerous and increasingly threatened by automation, but they offer something rare: a middle-class life without a college degree. Any serious move beyond oil must offer comparably paid alternatives.

    But the wastewater proposal offers no lasting future. It makes drilling-dependent communities absorb the industry’s toxic waste to sustain rising production, even though avoiding the worst climate outcomes requires fossil fuel use to fall. Finding somewhere new to dump the waste only postpones the question of what comes next.

    This is an area where the incentives of the climate movement, public health and conservation groups, ranchers and landowners, and anyone interested in human and environmental health—MAHA Moms included—align. The industry’s plan for survival requires moving fast. The chance to slow it down is there for anyone willing to tell an electorate already watching bulldozers roll through Big Bend National Park that these men have literally trashed Texas—and are proposing to trash it further. And to say, instead, that it may be time to clean the place up.

    How to fight Texas wastewater permits

    All five Permian discharge applications—for the Pecos River basin—are currently under TCEQ review and comments are open now. You can submit comments or request a public meeting through TCEQ’s eComment site, using these permit numbers.

    • NGL Water Solutions Permian (Reeves County) — #WQ0005445000 — Proposed permit details —
    • Solaris Water Midstream (Reeves County) — #WQ0005471000 — Proposed permit details —
    • Solaris Water Midstream No. 2 (Culberson County) — #WQ0005474000 — Proposed permit details —
    • Texas Pacific Water Resources (Reeves County) — #WQ0005454000 — Proposed permit details —
    • Select Water Solutions (Reeves County) — #WQ0005495000 — Proposed permit details —

    Readers living in Texas can also subscribe to TCEQ’s permit notices, which allow Texas residents to get notice of projects planned for their zip code—or monitor its long list of pending wastewater permits.

    Anyone can comment, but those who are directly impacted by these discharges—downstream landowners, irrigators, water users, and people who rely on the Pecos—can go further. If enough write in, they can push the agency into a contested hearing—a trial-like proceeding where they can challenge the permit’s facts. And if they’ve commented, they can establish the standing to challenge a project in court.

    At some point in the coming months, the agency will start issuing draft permits, which will start a 30 day counter, after which comment will close.

    For those who are impacted, environmental advocates say, the key things to do are are:

    1. Taking good records of how you use the affected waterway for business, recreation or irrigation
    2. Commenting within 30 days of the issuance of a draft permit to establish standing, and
    3. Getting organized before the permits drop, because once they do, things move fast.

    Veterans of this process emphasize that the odds of successfully getting a permit denied or revoked are low. But contested hearings, court battles and local comments form a broader drama of local democracy that can sway elected officials, persuade companies to seek greener pastures, and become grist for electoral or legislative efforts at reform—as the grassroots campaigns against data centers have shown.

    If you or someone you know relies on water near the proposed discharge sites, owns or works affected land, irrigates downstream, or has information that could help document the risks, contact Future Heist. We can help connect people with public-interest environmental lawyers following these cases.

  • We Built a Map of Every Texas Well at Risk of Leaking Toxic Oilfield Wastewater

    Texas pumps billions of barrels of oilfield wastewater back underground every year. That pressure has to go somewhere — one place it can end up is the nearest old well, a zombie well, plugged and forgotten, coming back to life as a live path to the surface.

    25,719 of Texas’s plugged wells score Critical for zombie risk. Another 52,921 score High. 934 injection wells statewide have a documented casing failure — a leak between tubing and casing, the clearest sign a wellbore has already given out. Nearly 2 in 5 Texas schools and daycares have one of these wells within a mile.

  • The Texas Oil Industry Wants to Dump Its Toxic Wastewater on Farms. Regulators Need To Protect The Public.

    Texas wants to let oil and gas companies treat produced water, the salty and often radioactive waste from oil wells, and spray it on farmland across the state. We think that rule’s not ready. It tests for the things you’d find in sewage, not for things like radioactive elements, forever chemicals, or cancer-causing chemicals like benzene — all common in oilfield waste. The setbacks were built around odor complaints rather than spills. And it lets companies keep the test data quiet and leave the cleanup to neighbors and, eventually, taxpayers.

    New Mexico looked at the same waste and banned it. Texas is rushing the other way.

  • Texans Want Their Land and Health Protected from Toxic Oilfield Wastewater

    TCEQ asked whether oil and gas companies should be allowed to spread treated produced water on Texas land. Forty-six people wrote in. We read them and pulled out what each person said.

    Zero commenters supported the rule outright (as of 2026/06/15 at 1:30 pm). Nearly everyone was concerned or hostile. Texans don’t want this wastewater on their land or in their water.

    Browse the comments below. See the breakdown by stance and topic, and read the original letters yourself.

  • Texas Deleted Its Data About Which Towns Have Dangerous Water. We Grabbed it for You.

    Texas audits cities’ water every year — but state regulators just deleted 15 years of those records from the web, making it nearly impossible to check your town’s past.

    We saved the files and built this map so you can see the actual pollution in your area. Use it to find out what is in your water, so you can fight for better water.

  • She Thought Her Daughter Was Faking Sick. Then She Found Out Her Elementary School Was Built on a Drilling Waste Site.

    When hundreds of North Texas homeowners bought into a new planned community, no one told them about the drilling waste dump that lay beneath the site — until Future Heist reporting revealed its history.

    Now, amid reports of sick kids in the local elementary, the company that sold those homes insists that it acted better than other developers would. It insists the ground is clean. Just don’t ask to see the results.